Perioperative complications are common in kidney transplantation. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a well-established multimodal perioperative care pathway designed to improve patient outcomes, however, its efficacy in renal transplant remains poorly described. Participating centres included adult renal transplant recipients and 30-day follow-up data. The primary outcome was LOS. Multivariable hierarchical models compared cohorts. 213 patients were included in the study period. 18/23 UK kidney transplant centres were represented. Analysis of the perioperative care delivery demonstrated similar patterns irrespective of reported protocols, with a tendency towards ERAS-type care. Between cohorts, the incidence of complications were similar; formal ERAS 14.3%, ERAS informal 17.0%, no ERAS 12.6%; p = 0.64. Median LOS was also similar; formal ERAS 6.0 days (5.0-11.5), informal ERAS 7.0 days (5.0-10.5) vs. no ERAS 6.0 days (5.0-10.5); p = 0.75. Readmissions were comparable; p = 0.721. Multivariable models confirmed these findings and demonstrated frailer patients had longer LOS and more readmissions. Currently, most UK renal transplant centres deliver a form of peri-operative ERAS care, indicating broad adoption of ERAS principles. Consequently, a formal ERAS protocol is not associated with decreased complications, LOS or readmissions. Efforts to improve outcomes should focus on prehabilitation of at-risk groups on the waiting list.
Keywords: ERAS in kidney transplantation; enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); kidney; perioperative care; prehabilitation.
Copyright © 2026 Owen, Kourounis, Karki, Connor, Brown, Kayani, Elzawahry, Blanco, Schilirò, Smith, Mehew, Manook, Scuffell, Amer, Tingle, Thompson and CRAFT Study Collaborators.