Objective: To investigate the practicality of the M-Quick SIN for hearing screening in elderly individuals during physical examinations and to evaluate its consistency with pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Methods: The study is a cross-sectional study, a total of 980 elderly individuals (586 males, 394 females; Age range: 60-90 years old, with an average of 66.4±5.8 years old) who underwent physical examinations at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital physical examination center from February to December 2023, were screened using PTA and M-Quick SIN. We performed statistical analysis using SPSS 27.0, and the practicality of M-Quick SIN was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The signal-to-noise ratio loss (SNR loss) in the poorer ear measured by M-Quick SIN showed a statistically significant gender difference, with males demonstrating greater loss than females (Z=2.859, P<0.05), and increased withage and the average hearing threshold across 500, 1 000, 2 000, and 4 000 Hz frequencies (4-frequency pure-tone average, 4fPTA) in the poorer ear. Multiple linear regression analysis showed, age (β=0.163, P<0.001) and poorer ear 4fPTA (β=0.729, P<0.001) have a significant positive predictive effect on poorer ear M-Quick SIN SNR loss, while gender has no significant effect on poorer ear M-Quick SIN SNR loss (P=0.642). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the M-Quick SIN signal-to-noise ratio loss in the poorer ear predicted a poorer-ear 4fPTA>35 dBHL with an AUC of 0.89±0.01, and the optimal cut-off value was>11 dB. Concordance between poorer ear M-Quick SIN SNR loss>11 dB and poorer ear 4fPTA>35 dBHL was substantial (Kappa=0.611, P<0.001). Conclusions: As a speech-in-noise test, M-Quick SIN can serve as a supplementary screening tool for hearing loss in the elderly. A bilateral M-Quick SIN SNR loss≤11 dB may be considered the pass criterion for hearing screening, demonstrating high practicality and accuracy.
目的: 探讨普通话快速噪声下言语测试(M-Quick SIN)用于老年体检人群听力筛查的实用性,并评估其与纯音听阈测试的一致性。 方法: 本研究为横断面研究,对2023年2—12月在北京协和医院体检中心进行体检的980名老年人[男性586名,女性394名;年龄(66.4±5.8)岁,范围60~90岁]进行纯音听阈测试及M-Quick SIN测试。应用SPSS 27.0统计软件对数据进行统计学分析,根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及曲线下面积(AUC)值,判断M-Quick SIN的实用性。 结果: 听力较差耳M-Quick SIN信噪比损失(signal-to-noise ratio loss)在不同性别间存在差异,男性大于女性,差异有统计学意义(Z=2.859,P<0.05);信噪比损失随受试者年龄以及较差耳500、1 000、2 000、4 000 Hz四个频率的平均听阈(4-frequency pure-tone average,4fPTA)的增加呈上升趋势。多元线性回归分析显示,年龄(β=0.163,P<0.001)和较差耳4fPTA(β=0.729,P<0.001)对较差耳M-Quick SIN信噪比损失具有显著的正向预测作用,而性别对较差耳M-Quick SIN信噪比损失无明显影响,差异无统计学意义(P=0.642)。ROC曲线分析显示,较差耳M-Quick SIN信噪比损失预测较差耳4fPTA>35 dBHL的AUC值为0.89±0.01,最佳截断值为>11 dB。较差耳M-Quick SIN信噪比损失>11 dB与较差耳4fPTA>35 dBHL的筛查结果一致性较好,Kappa值=0.611(P<0.001)。 结论: M-Quick SIN可作为老年听力损失的补充筛查方法,双耳信噪比损失≤11 dB可视为听力筛查通过的标准,具有较高的实用性和准确性。.