Evaluating Virtual and Hybrid Mentorship in Orthopaedic Surgery: Perceived Benefits, Challenges, and Impacts in the Post-COVID Era

Abstract

» Virtual and hybrid mentorship models have transitioned from temporary coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic responses to durable, scalable components of the orthopaedic training curriculum. » Despite high trainee satisfaction, most orthopaedic virtual mentorship programs rely on short-term, self-reported metrics and lack the objective, longitudinal tracking of research productivity or career advancement seen in other specialties. » While virtual pipelines demonstrate the potential to broaden access for underrepresented groups, inconsistent collection of detailed demographic and socioeconomic data limits the assessment of their true impact on diversity. » Neurosurgery and plastic surgery provide instructive models for virtual collaboratives that successfully use standardized expectations and longitudinal outcome tracking to measure success. » To ensure these programs drive equitable change rather than just broader participation, future orthopaedic virtual mentorship programs should incorporate standardized outcome frameworks, mentor perspectives, and longitudinal, multi-institutional follow-up.