Background: Treatment selection in endocrine-resistant HR+ /HER2 - metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains challenging, and early predictive biomarkers are lacking. Circulating thymidine kinase 1 activity (TKa) is a blood-based proliferation marker suitable for dynamic monitoring.
Methods: This translational study was conducted within the phase III GEICAM/2013-02 PEARL trial comparing endocrine therapy (ET) plus palbociclib versus capecitabine in HR+ /HER2 - MBC. Plasma from 555 patients was analyzed using a standardized FDA-cleared assay. TKa was assessed at baseline using a prespecified cutoff of 250 DuA to define low versus high proliferative activity, and additional thresholds were explored for treatment interaction and on-treatment monitoring. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using multivariable Cox models.
Results: Low baseline TKa (≤250 DuA) was independently associated with longer PFS (11.4 vs 4.0 months) and OS (38.5 vs 17.3 months), in multivariate analysis and irrespective of treatment. However, baseline TKa did not discriminate benefit between arms. Early on-treatment TKa dynamics provided treatment-specific information. At cycle 1 day 15, median TKa was higher with capecitabine than with ET plus palbociclib (448 vs 28 DuA), consistent with distinct mechanisms. In the capecitabine arm, a > 2-fold early increase in TKa was independently associated with improved PFS and OS. Conversely, persistently elevated TKa (>50 DuA) during ET plus palbociclib identified patients with poorer outcomes, regardless of baseline levels.
Conclusions: Baseline TKa is strongly prognostic, while early dynamic changes provide additional, treatment-specific information, reflecting differences in mechanism of action between therapies, that support response monitoring.
Keywords: Biomarker; Capecitabine; Endocrine resistance; HR+ /HER2 − metastatic breast cancer; Palbociclib; Thymidine kinase 1 (TK1); Treatment response monitoring.
Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.