Assessing task workload during military En Route Critical Care (ERCC) and other high-risk clinical operations remains challenging. This study evaluated heart rate variability (HRV) and body motion as digital biomarkers of task workload among Critical Care Air Transport (CCAT) teams during simulated ERCC missions. Seventy-two U.S. Air Force clinicians participated in 26 high-fidelity simulations. HRV and body motion were continuously captured via a chest-strap wearable sensor, and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was used to assess self-reported workload. Results demonstrated high feasibility (>90% HRV, 100% motion retention) with high wearable comfort ratings. Both HRV and Motion metrics showed strong construct validity, significantly differentiating resting baseline from active simulation (all p < 0.001, effect sizes d = 0.54-1.22 for HRV, r = 0.92-1.00 for motion). Convergent validity was selective: only baseline-adjusted root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) demonstrated significant associations with NASA-TLX mental demand (β = -0.250, p = 0.005) and temporal demand (β = -0.233, p = 0.003). Baseline-adjusted RMSSD effectively indexes perceived workload, while Motion metrics provide complementary information about physical task demands. These findings support multimodal approaches integrating physiological reactivity, motion patterns, and self-reported ratings for comprehensive workload assessment in complex operational settings.
Keywords: body motion; cognitive load; digital biomarkers; en route critical care; medical simulations; military medicine.