Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality

N Engl J Med. 1979 Dec 20;301(25):1364-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503.


This study examines mortality rates for 12 surgical procedures of varying complexity in 1498 hospitals to determine whether there is a relation between a hospital's surgical volume and its surgical mortality. The mortality of open-heart surgery, vascular surgery, transurethral resection of the prostate, and coronary bypass decreased with increasing number of operations. Hospitals in which 200 or more of these operations were done annually had death rates, adjusted for case mix, 25 to 41 per cent lower than hospitals with lower volumes. For other procedures, the mortality curve flattened at lower volumes. For example, hospitals doing 50 to 100 total hip replacements attained a mortality rate for this procedure almost as low as that of hospitals doing 200 or more. Some procedures, such as cholecystectomy, showed no relation between volume and mortality. The results may reflect the effect of volume or experience on mortality, or referrals to institutions with better outcomes, as well as a number of other factors, such as patient selection. Regardless of the explanation, these data support the value of regionalization for certain operations.

MeSH terms

  • Hospital Departments / statistics & numerical data*
  • Hospital Planning
  • Hospitals, General
  • Humans
  • Statistics as Topic*
  • Surgery Department, Hospital / statistics & numerical data*
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative / mortality*
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative / standards
  • United States