Cimetidine vs antacid in prophylaxis for stress ulceration

Arch Surg. 1981 May;116(5):597-601. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1981.01380170077013.

Abstract

Seven-seven critically ill patients were prospectively randomized into four groups to compare antacids and various doses of cimetidine in the neutralization of gastric acid for preventing complications of stress ulcers. Gastric pH was monitored hourly, basing the efficacy of neutralization on preselected pH values for each study group. Cimetidine provided adequate neutralization in 14 (23%) of 61 patients. Gastric acid in all 16 patients treated with antacids was adequately neutralized. Stress bleeding occurred in three (5%) patients treated with cimetidine and in no patient treated with antacids. Reversible thrombocytopenia developed in six (26%) of 23 patients treated with 2,400 mg/day of cimetidine. Hourly monitoring of gastric pH is a mandatory component in the prevention of stress bleeding. Antacid is the preferred agent for gastric acid neutralization because it is more effective, safer, and less expensive.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antacids / therapeutic use*
  • Cimetidine / therapeutic use*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Critical Care
  • Gastric Acidity Determination
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / prevention & control
  • Guanidines / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Stomach Ulcer / prevention & control*
  • Stress, Physiological / complications*
  • Thrombocytosis / chemically induced

Substances

  • Antacids
  • Guanidines
  • Cimetidine