Background: A gradual change in the management of splenic injuries has occurred at our institution. This study was therefore undertaken to determine whether changes in management of splenic injury influenced outcomes during the past 30 years.
Patients and methods: A retrospective study of patients admitted with splenic trauma between 1965 and 1994 was performed. Two hundred seven patients were identified and demographic and outcome data were recorded. Patients were then grouped based upon the period in which they received treatment (ie, Period I [1965 to 1974], Period II [1975 to 1984], and Period III [1985 to 1994]), and the type of treatment received (ie, splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or observation).
Results: More patients were treated in Period III than in the other two periods, and Period III patients had shorter hospital stays. Splenectomy was solely used during Period I; splenorrhaphy and observation were occasionally performed during Period II; and splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, and observation were performed in near-equal numbers during Period III. Mortality was similar for each period, though Injury Severity Scores (ISS) were higher during later years. When compared by treatment modality, patients receiving splenectomy had higher ISS and splenic injury classifications.
Conclusion: Patients treated by splenorrhaphy and observation for splenic injury have markedly increased over the past 30 years without adverse outcome.