The use of survey measures to assess circadian variations in alertness

Sleep. 1995 Jun;18(5):355-61. doi: 10.1093/sleep/18.5.355.


Current models of sleep regulation postulate both a homeostatic and circadian component and promise an understanding of disturbed and displaced sleep. Estimates of these components have traditionally required relatively cumbersome and costly measures, including sleep electroencephalograms and continuously recorded rectal temperature, but it has recently been demonstrated that they may successfully be based on frequent (e.g. 2-hourly) concurrent ratings of alertness. This paper examines whether similar results might be obtained using retrospective survey measures of alertness obtained from shiftworking nurses at a single sitting. These retrospective measures are shown to be sensitive to both time of day and shift, to have a high level of reliability even for relatively small sample sizes (e.g. 10) and to be valid predictors of more traditional concurrent measures of alertness. It is concluded that retrospective alertness ratings may prove to be an extremely cost-effective method for examining the trends in alertness in various groups, including those suffering from specific types of sleep disorder.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Body Temperature
  • Circadian Rhythm*
  • Electroencephalography
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sleep*
  • Time Factors
  • Wakefulness*
  • Work