Recruitment and retention of subjects for a longitudinal cancer prevention study in an inner-city black community

Health Serv Res. 1995 Apr;30(1 Pt 2):197-205.


Recruiting and retaining subjects for longitudinal prevention trials is challenging. The inherent difficulties are compounded when the trial is to take place in a low-income minority community, since prevention is a low priority among residents of such communities, and research is viewed with suspicion. We present our experiences in attempting to recruit and retain low-income black women living in inner-city Atlanta for a trial of an educational intervention to promote screening for cancer. The intervention was conducted in the home by trained lay health workers. We found that recruitment was more successful when we recruited directly from the community than when we recruited from the patient registry of a primary health care center. The attrition rate over an 18-month period was high. Among members of the intervention group, those retained in the study tended to be wealthier and better educated and were more likely to be married and employed than those who dropped out. It seems probable that women of lower socioeconomic status found our intervention to be intrusive or burdensome. Among the controls, socioeconomic factors did not discriminate between those who completed the study and those who did not; loss to follow-up in this group was associated only with younger age. In conducting research of this type in low-income minority communities, special attention must be given to issues of recruitment and retention if the validity of the study is to be preserved.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • African Americans*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Georgia
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Neoplasms / prevention & control*
  • Patient Selection*
  • Poverty*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Urban Population*