Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 102 (2), 379-95

The Experience of Regret: What, When, and Why

Affiliations
Review

The Experience of Regret: What, When, and Why

T Gilovich et al. Psychol Rev.

Abstract

This article reviews evidence indicating that there is a temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Actions, or errors of commission, generate more regret in the short term; but inactions, or errors of omission, produce more regret in the long run. The authors contend that this temporal pattern is multiply determined, and present a framework to organize the divergent causal mechanisms that are responsible for it. In particular, this article documents the importance of psychological processes that (a) decrease the pain of regrettable action over time, (b) bolster the pain of regrettable inaction over time, and (c) differentially affect the cognitive availability of these two types of regrets. Both the functional and cultural origins of how people think about regret are discussed.

Similar articles

  • To Do or Not to Do: Desirability and Consistency Mediate Judgements of Regret
    JJ Seta et al. J Pers Soc Psychol 80 (6), 861-70. PMID 11414370.
    In 4 studies, the authors demonstrated that when errors associated with action were inconsistent with decision nakers' orientation, they were undesirable and produced mor …
  • The Temporal Pattern to the Experience of Regret
    T Gilovich et al. J Pers Soc Psychol 67 (3), 357-65. PMID 7965599.
    Through telephone surveys, written questionnaires, and face-to-face interviews, it was found that people's biggest regrets tend to involve things they have failed to do i …
  • Cultural Grounding of Regret: Regret in Self and Interpersonal Contexts
    A Komiya et al. Cogn Emot 25 (6), 1121-30. PMID 21895573.
    The purpose of this study was to explore cultural similarities and differences in regret, focusing on distinctions between interpersonal and self-situations, and between …
  • Mindful Judgment and Decision Making
    EU Weber et al. Annu Rev Psychol 60, 53-85. PMID 18798706. - Review
    A full range of psychological processes has been put into play to explain judgment and choice phenomena. Complementing work on attention, information integration, and lea …
  • Biased Predecision Processing
    AL Brownstein. Psychol Bull 129 (4), 545-68. PMID 12848220. - Review
    Decision makers conduct biased predecision processing when they restructure their mental representation of the decision environment to favor one alternative before making …
See all similar articles

Cited by 41 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback