Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1369-74. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754875.

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to prospectively compare helical CT with pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with an unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis.

Subjects and methods: Twenty patients with an unresolved suspicion of pulmonary embolism were evaluated with contrast-enhanced helical CT and with selective pulmonary angiography. An average of 11 hr separated the two studies. The CT scans were obtained during one 24-sec or two 12-sec breath-holds. CT scans were interpreted without knowledge of the results of scintigraphy or angiography. Selective pulmonary angiograms were obtained with knowledge of the findings on the ventilation/perfusion scan only. The sensitivity and specificity of CT were compared with those of angiography for central vessels (segmental and larger) only and for all vessels.

Results: Eleven of the 20 patients had proved pulmonary embolism (seven in central vessels and four in subsegmental vessels only). When only central vessels were analyzed, CT sensitivity was 86%, specificity was 92%, and the likelihood ratio was 10.7. However, when subsegmental vessels were included, CT results were 63%, 89%, and 5.7, respectively.

Conclusion: In our subset of patients, helical CT was only 63% sensitive. Subsegmental emboli are difficult to diagnose. Pulmonary angiography remains the study of choice. CT has a limited role in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiography*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lung / blood supply
  • Lung / diagnostic imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnostic imaging*
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*