Reliability of three methods of radiologic assessment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Invest Radiol. 1995 Mar;30(3):181-5. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199503000-00008.

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To assess the intraobserver reliability of three methods used frequently to evaluate joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: the Sharp method, the Larsen method, and the carpo:metacarpal ratio.

Methods: One observer analyzed twice within a 6-week interval 71 radiographs from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Reliability was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficient (R) and by Altman-Bland graphical method. Correlations were examined by the Spearman's coefficient (r).

Results: The intraobserver reliability of each method appeared satisfactory with a good result for the Sharp method (R = 0.97). The correlation was strong (r > 0.80) between the results obtained by Sharp's and Larsen's methods and weaker between the results of the two former methods and the carpo: metacarpal ratio.

Conclusions: Sharp's method should be used preferentially in studies evaluating the radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis over time, especially in clinical trials. The carpo:metacarpal ratio may be considered as a complementary method, when wrist destruction is of conceptual importance.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid / diagnostic imaging*
  • Female
  • Hand / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiography / methods
  • Radiography / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Wrist Joint / diagnostic imaging