Limited value of two widely used enzyme immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;13(8):651-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01973991.

Abstract

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are widely used to diagnose chlamydial infections in patients attending genitourinary medicine clinics. They are relatively easy to perform and are suitable for testing large numbers of samples. The objective of this study was to determine what proportion of women with chlamydial infection, defined as the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in a cervical smear or deposit and/or in the urinary tract, detected by means of a sensitive direct fluorescent antibody test could also be identified by using two commercially available EIAs to test cervical samples. On hundred fifty-one women attending the genitourinary medicine clinic at St. Mary's Hospital, London, were enrolled. The use of the Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Diagnostics, UK) and MicroTrak (Syva, UK) EIAs resulted in the identification of only 56% and 63%, respectively, of women with chlamydial infection detected by direct fluorescent antibody staining. Thus, the EIAs available for detection of chlamydiae in cervical samples are inadequate for identifying all infected women. Improvement might be achieved by testing multiple samples or by resorting to tests of greater sensitivity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Chlamydia Infections / diagnosis*
  • Chlamydia Infections / urine
  • Chlamydia trachomatis / isolation & purification*
  • Female
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Humans
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Vaginal Smears / methods