The Medical Council of Canada's key features project: a more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills

Acad Med. 1995 Feb;70(2):104-10. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199502000-00012.

Abstract

In 1986 the Medical Council of Canada (MCC) commissioned a six-year research and development project to create a new, more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills for the Canadian Qualifying Examination in Medicine. At that time, the qualifying examination consisted of three booklets of multiple-choice questions and one booklet of patient management problems administered over a two-day period. All graduates of Canadian and foreign medical schools must pass this examination before practicing medicine anywhere in Canada except Québec. The project was undertaken because (1) numerous studies do not support the use of patient management problems (PMPs) to assess clinical decision-making skills, and (2) research results on the characteristics of clinical decision-making skills offered guidance to develop new approaches to their assessment. In particular, research suggested that these skills are specific to the case or problem encountered and are contingent on the effective manipulation of a few elements of the problem that are crucial to its successful resolution--the problem's key features. The problems developed by this project focused only on the assessment of these key features. The project was implemented in three overlapping phases over a six-year period, 1986-1992, each containing a development component followed by a pilot test through which the research studies were carried out. The pilot tests were conducted by presenting sets of new key feature problems to classes of graduating students in medical schools across Canada.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Clinical Competence*
  • Clinical Medicine*
  • Decision Making*
  • Education, Medical, Graduate*
  • Educational Measurement / methods*
  • Problem Solving
  • Program Development*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design