The value of multiple fluid specimens in the cytological diagnosis of malignancy
- PMID: 7991525
The value of multiple fluid specimens in the cytological diagnosis of malignancy
Abstract
Multiple fluid specimens of a patient are often received in the cytology laboratory. Both clinicians and pathologists question the optimal number of specimens required to detect a malignancy. We reviewed the computerized cytology files at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital from 1988 to 1991 to identify patients with two or more specimens from the same anatomic site. Two hundred and fifteen patients with a total of 570 specimens were identified. Before December 19, 1990, two direct smears were examined per fluid sample. After December 19, 1990, two direct smears and two cytospin preparations were examined. Medical records of patients without a positive diagnosis of cytology were reviewed. Overall, a cytological diagnosis of malignancy was made on at least one specimen for 55 patients (26%). The first positive diagnosis was made on the initial specimen in 36 patients (65%), on the second in 15 patients (27%), the third in three patients (5%), and the fifth in one patient (2%). For those specimens prepared with the two techniques described above (two direct and two concentrated smears), the first positive diagnosis was made on the initial specimen in 89% of the cases. Medical record review uncovered 55 additional patients who had clinical evidence of malignancy. Of these, 22 (40%) had at least one suspicious diagnosis of their fluid specimens. The first suspicious diagnosis was made with three or fewer specimens in all 22 patients. The majority of malignant effusions are detected with two specimens. Examination of more than three specimens is of little value. Multiple preparatory, especially concentration, techniques may increase the probability of detecting malignancy in one specimen.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the effectiveness of malignancy detection in body fluid examination by the cytopathology and hematology laboratories.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Sep;121(9):976-9. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997. PMID: 9302931
-
Tissue culture of cells in serous effusions. Evaluation as an adjunct to cytology.Acta Cytol. 1978 Nov-Dec;22(6):487-9. Acta Cytol. 1978. PMID: 282748
-
[Experiments for increasing statement power of cytodiagnosis from cavitary effusions in malignant tumors. I. Modified methodical processing of cytological smears from effusions of the pleural cavity and ascites].Radiobiol Radiother (Berl). 1975;16(4):473-81. Radiobiol Radiother (Berl). 1975. PMID: 1208831 German. No abstract available.
-
Serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: a review.Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 May;34(5):335-47. doi: 10.1002/dc.20432. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006. PMID: 16604559 Review.
-
The usefulness of cytology.Br J Hosp Med. 1980 Mar;23(3):256-8, 260, 262-5. Br J Hosp Med. 1980. PMID: 6246999 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Malignant pleural disease.Breathe (Sheff). 2023 Dec;19(4):230145. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0145-2023. Epub 2024 Feb 13. Breathe (Sheff). 2023. PMID: 38351947 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Malignant Pleural Effusions: Updates in Diagnosis and Management.Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;13(1):115. doi: 10.3390/life13010115. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36676064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Decade in Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;12(4):1016. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12041016. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35454064 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic value and safety of thoracoscopic pleural biopsies in pleural exudative effusions of unknown origin, including follow-up.BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Mar;9(1):e001161. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001161. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022. PMID: 35277425 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic pitfalls in effusion fluid cytology.Cytojournal. 2021 Dec 6;18:33. doi: 10.25259/CMAS_02_04_2021. eCollection 2021. Cytojournal. 2021. PMID: 35126611 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical