Epidemiology and transmission of HIV-2. Why there is no HIV-2 pandemic

JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2083-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.17.2083.


Although human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 share modes of transmission, their epidemiologic characteristics differ and international spread of HIV-2 has been very limited. Recently, the prevalence of infection with HIV-1 but not HIV-2 has increased rapidly in different West African countries, where HIV-2 was probably present earlier. Among 19,701 women of reproductive age tested in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, between 1988 and 1992, the prevalence of HIV-1 infection increased from 5.0% to 9.2%, while that of HIV-2 declined from 2.6% to 1.5%. Differences in viral load may be responsible: reported results of virus culture and polymerase chain reaction assays suggest that at high CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts viral load is lower in HIV-2-infected than in HIV-1-infected persons; the efficacy of heterosexual and perinatal transmission of HIV-2 is less efficient than that of HIV-1 at this stage. At low (< 0.20 x 10(9)/L [< 200/microL]) CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, virus isolation is equally successful for both viruses, and the efficacy of heterosexual transmission is similar. Differences in HIV-1 and HIV-2 natural history are reflected in differences in viral load, that for HIV-2 being lower until immunodeficiency is severe. Differences in viral load throughout most of the natural history of infection appear to correlate with lower transmissibility of HIV-2 than HIV-1, and are the likeliest explanation for their markedly different global epidemiology.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Africa, Western / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Global Health
  • HIV Infections / epidemiology*
  • HIV Infections / transmission*
  • HIV-1* / pathogenicity
  • HIV-2* / pathogenicity
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Prevalence
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral / epidemiology
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral / transmission