Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins
- PMID: 8208723
- DOI: 10.1002/prot.340180402
Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins
Abstract
The maintenance of protein function and structure constrains the evolution of amino acid sequences. This fact can be exploited to interpret correlated mutations observed in a sequence family as an indication of probable physical contact in three dimensions. Here we present a simple and general method to analyze correlations in mutational behavior between different positions in a multiple sequence alignment. We then use these correlations to predict contact maps for each of 11 protein families and compare the result with the contacts determined by crystallography. For the most strongly correlated residue pairs predicted to be in contact, the prediction accuracy ranges from 37 to 68% and the improvement ratio relative to a random prediction from 1.4 to 5.1. Predicted contact maps can be used as input for the calculation of protein tertiary structure, either from sequence information alone or in combination with experimental information.
Similar articles
-
Prediction of distant residue contacts with the use of evolutionary information.Proteins. 2005 Mar 1;58(4):935-49. doi: 10.1002/prot.20370. Proteins. 2005. PMID: 15645442
-
Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from three-dimensional structures.J Mol Biol. 1993 Aug 5;232(3):805-25. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1433. J Mol Biol. 1993. PMID: 8355272
-
Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions.J Mol Biol. 2000 Oct 27;303(3):433-46. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4146. J Mol Biol. 2000. PMID: 11031119
-
Predicting the conformation of proteins from sequences. Progress and future progress.J Mol Recognit. 1995 Jan-Apr;8(1-2):9-28. doi: 10.1002/jmr.300080104. J Mol Recognit. 1995. PMID: 7598957 Review.
-
Correlated substitution analysis and the prediction of amino acid structural contacts.Brief Bioinform. 2008 Jan;9(1):46-56. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbm052. Epub 2007 Nov 13. Brief Bioinform. 2008. PMID: 18000015 Review.
Cited by
-
Deep learning methods in protein structure prediction.Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Jan 22;18:1301-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.011. eCollection 2020. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020. PMID: 32612753 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the functional roles of coevolving PHD finger residues.Protein Sci. 2024 Jul;33(7):e5065. doi: 10.1002/pro.5065. Protein Sci. 2024. PMID: 38923615
-
Combining cysteine scanning with chemical labeling to map protein-protein interactions and infer bound structure in an intrinsically disordered region.Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Oct 7;9:997653. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.997653. eCollection 2022. Front Mol Biosci. 2022. PMID: 36275627 Free PMC article.
-
Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI.Proteins. 2016 Sep;84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):4-14. doi: 10.1002/prot.25064. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Proteins. 2016. PMID: 27171127 Free PMC article.
-
Structural models of the KtrB, TrkH, and Trk1,2 symporters based on the structure of the KcsA K(+) channel.Biophys J. 1999 Aug;77(2):789-807. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76932-8. Biophys J. 1999. PMID: 10423426 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
