Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Sep;8(9):1111-5.
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080912.

Demonstration of a Difference in Urinary Calcium, Not Calcium Absorption, in Black and White Adolescents

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Demonstration of a Difference in Urinary Calcium, Not Calcium Absorption, in Black and White Adolescents

N H Bell et al. J Bone Miner Res. .

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm, lumbar spine, and femoral neck is greater in black than in white children. Studies were performed to determine whether differences in intestinal absorption of calcium or urinary calcium or both account for an assumed more positive calcium balance and greater bone mass in black children. Normal black and white boys and girls were admitted to a metabolic ward and given a constant daily diet containing 1000 mg calcium, 60% as calcium carbonate, for 2 1/2 days (study I) or 3 1/2 days (study II). Fasting blood and 24 h urine collections were obtained, and in study II, unidirectional fractional absorption of calcium (alpha) was determined with stable isotopes of calcium. It was found that (1) serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and urinary calcium were lower and serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25-(OH)2D] was higher in black than in white children, and (2) alpha was higher in boys than in girls with no racial difference, and (3) there were significant positive correlations between alpha and urinary calcium in the blacks and in the black and white children together. It is concluded that (1) alpha is higher in boys than in girls and (2) a lower urinary calcium, not increased intestinal absorption of calcium, is the means for a more positive calcium balance in blacks that accounts for the racial difference in BMD.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 21 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback