Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention
- PMID: 8294892
- DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.6.1278
Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention
Abstract
Four experiments examined effects of bimodal stimulation on response force (RF) in addition to reaction time (RT). In a divided-attention task (Experiments 1 to 3), subjects were asked for a speeded response to either a visual or an auditory signal. In unimodal signal trials, either a visual or an auditory signal was presented alone, and in redundant-signals trials, both signals were presented simultaneously. The same stimulus arrangement was used in a focused-attention task (Experiment 4), but subjects had to withhold their response when an auditory signal was presented alone. In all experiments, the fastest RTs were attained in redundant-signals trials. In addition, RF was largest in redundant-signals trials, especially in the divided-attention task, suggesting a motor coactivation hypothesis. The results indicate that the type of stimulation influences not only when a response is initiated but also how the response is executed. This finding challenges the view, commonly held in mental chronometry, that late motoric processes remain untouched by experimental manipulations. A detailed analysis of the relationship between RT and RF revealed that these variables are not inherently redundant measures, and, therefore, RF recording may supplement the traditional RT measurement in mental chronometry.
Similar articles
-
Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: a neurophysiological analysis.Percept Psychophys. 2001 Apr;63(3):555-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03194420. Percept Psychophys. 2001. PMID: 11414141
-
Coactivation of response initiation processes with redundant signals.Neurosci Lett. 2018 May 14;675:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Neurosci Lett. 2018. PMID: 29555517
-
Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;180(4):737-54. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0894-3. Epub 2007 Feb 27. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17333012
-
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21. Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16497283
-
Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.Neurosci Lett. 2007 May 1;417(2):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.069. Epub 2007 Feb 15. Neurosci Lett. 2007. PMID: 17408855
Cited by
-
Age-related decrease in motor contribution to multisensory reaction times in primary school children.Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Sep 8;16:967081. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.967081. eCollection 2022. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36158624 Free PMC article.
-
Target detection and discrimination in pop-out visual search with two targets.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1538-1552. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02495-2. Epub 2022 May 3. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 35505066
-
Top-down task-specific determinants of multisensory motor reaction time enhancements and sensory switch costs.Exp Brain Res. 2021 Mar;239(3):1021-1034. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-06014-3. Epub 2021 Jan 30. Exp Brain Res. 2021. PMID: 33515085 Free PMC article.
-
An Experimenter's Influence on Motor Enhancements: The Effects of Letter Congruency and Sensory Switch-Costs on Multisensory Integration.Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 1;11:588343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588343. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33335500 Free PMC article.
-
Eriksen's two-phase model of spatial selective attention: Physiological evidence of trial-mixing-dependent response inhibition.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):722-730. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02152-6. Epub 2020 Oct 18. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021. PMID: 33073322
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
