Percutaneous ablation of accessory pathways was performed in 22 consecutive children and adolescents (9 boys and 13 girls, age range 8 to 18 years). Low-energy direct current (DC) was used exclusively in the first 6 patients, whereas ablation was performed with radiofrequency energy in the following 16. Accessory pathways were located in the left free wall in 15 patients, were posteroseptal in 3, were in the right free wall in 3 and were anteroseptal in 1. A concealed accessory pathway was present in 7 patients (32%). There was no significant difference in clinical or electrophysiologic variables between both groups. Catheter ablation was successful in the initial 6 patients using low-energy DC, as compared with 13 of 16 patients using radiofrequency ablation. Low-energy DC was successful as a backup power source in all 3 patients who had unsuccessful radiofrequency ablation. There was no complication. The median procedural and fluoroscopic times for successful ablation were 2.5 hours and 49 minutes, respectively (p = NS between both power sources). Accessory pathway conduction recurred in 2 patients (33%) who had low-energy DC as compared with 1 (6%) who had radiofrequency ablation (p = NS). These 3 patients had successful reablation of their accessory pathways. In children and adolescents with accessory pathways, both new power sources compare favorably, with an overall success rate of ablation of 100% (22 of 22 patients). Radiofrequency ablation should be used initially because it does not require general anesthesia and is associated with a lower rate of recurrence of accessory pathway conduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)