In-house board-certified surgeons improve outcome for severely injured patients: a comparison of two university centers

J Trauma. 1993 Jun;34(6):871-5; discussion 875-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199306000-00019.

Abstract

The benefit derived from in-house board-certified attending surgeons (IHBCS) staffing trauma centers has recently been questioned. We compared the outcomes and provider-related complications of patients with severe injuries who were treated at two university trauma centers, one with IHBCS, and one with PGY-4 or PGY-5 residents in house (RIH). The RIH center had a significantly longer resuscitation time (160 vs. 58.8 minutes; p < 0.01). Except in cases of vascular injury, the odds ratio of dying at the RIH institution was significantly greater in all groups when the variables of transport time, Revised Trauma Score, and ISS were controlled. Errors in judgment were significantly more likely to have been made at the RIH institution in all groups. It is concluded that the management and ultimate outcome are significantly improved when IHBCS are involved with the resuscitation and early care of specific cohorts of severely injured patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • California
  • Certification
  • Clinical Competence
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitals, University / standards*
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency / standards*
  • Male
  • Medical Audit
  • Medical Staff, Hospital / standards*
  • Odds Ratio
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surgery Department, Hospital / standards*
  • Trauma Centers / standards
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vermont
  • Workforce
  • Wounds and Injuries / mortality*