Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain

J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Aug;70(2):118-20. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8.

Abstract

This study evaluated porcelain repair by use of various surface treatments and hydrophilic bonding resins. The surface treatments were air abrasion (sandblasting), roughening with a diamond, etching with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid, and a combination of the latter two methods. A silane coupling agent was applied to all porcelain surfaces, and composite resin was bonded to porcelain with All-Bond 2, Amalgambond, or Clearfil Porcelain bonding agents. Shear bond strengths were determined on a universal testing machine. The most effective surface treatment was the combination of diamond roughening and hydrofluoric acid etching, but it was not significantly better than the other methods. The Clearfil Porcelain Bond system showed a greater repair strength than the other two materials but was statistically different only from Amalgambond resin.

MeSH terms

  • Acid Etching, Dental
  • Adhesives / chemistry*
  • Aluminum Oxide / chemistry
  • Carbon
  • Composite Resins / chemistry*
  • Dental Alloys / chemistry
  • Dental Bonding* / methods
  • Dental Porcelain / chemistry*
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents / chemistry
  • Diamond
  • Hydrofluoric Acid / chemistry
  • Materials Testing
  • Methacrylates / chemistry
  • Resin Cements*
  • Silanes / chemistry
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Surface Properties

Substances

  • Adhesives
  • All-Bond system
  • Amalgambond
  • Clearfil Bonding Agent
  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Alloys
  • Dentin-Bonding Agents
  • Methacrylates
  • Resin Cements
  • Silanes
  • Dental Porcelain
  • Prisma APH
  • Carbon
  • Diamond
  • Vita VMK 68
  • Aluminum Oxide
  • Hydrofluoric Acid