Irreproducibility of the activity and chronicity indices limits their utility in the management of lupus nephritis. Lupus Nephritis Collaborative Study Group

Am J Kidney Dis. 1993 Apr;21(4):374-7. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80263-0.


Histological indices of renal pathology in lupus nephritis have been proposed as prognostic signs and as a method to quantitate therapeutic response. We tested the reproducibility of the activity (AI) and chronicity indices (CI) in the renal biopsies from 83 patients with lupus nephritis, enrolled in a controlled therapeutic trial. The AI/CI were calculated separately by four renal pathologists using published criteria. Pair-wise Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to examine the relationship among the scores of the four raters, and their degree of reproducibility was evaluated using the coefficient of reliability. The mean CI scores ranged from 2.84 to 4.61, and the mean AI ranged from 9.64 to 12.89. The correlation among the different pathologist's scores ranged from 0.44 to 0.63 for the AI and 0.60 to 0.76 for the CI. One pathologist (M.M.S.) rated the biopsies twice, and the correlation between the two ratings was 0.58 for the AI and 0.74 for the CI. Thus, the AI and CI calculated by different pathologists and the temporally separate observations of a single observer were only moderately correlated. The reproducibility of a single rating was low, showing a reliability coefficient of 0.48 for the AI and 0.57 for the CI. The low reliability coefficient suggests that the variability among pathologists was the result of interpretative differences. We conclude that the AI/CI are too subjective to be used as therapeutic guides or as prognosticators.

MeSH terms

  • Atrophy
  • Biopsy
  • Chronic Disease
  • Fibrosis
  • Humans
  • Kidney / pathology*
  • Lupus Nephritis / pathology*
  • Necrosis
  • Observer Variation
  • Reproducibility of Results