[In vitro study on biocompatibility of zirconium and titanium]
- PMID: 8482910
- DOI: 10.5357/koubyou.60.54
[In vitro study on biocompatibility of zirconium and titanium]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biocompatibility of zirconium compared with titanium by the in vitro study using human osteosarcoma cell line (HOS). Various characteristics of the HOS cells cultured on zirconium (99.9%) and titanium (99.9%) discs were investigated. On the colony formation of the HOS cells, there were no differences between the zirconium and titanium in colony size and number. Good proliferation of the HOS cells was observed on the zirconium as well as on the titanium. Morphological observation of the HOS cells by SEM revealed that the cells on the zirconium as well as on the titanium were flat and polygonal in shape with radial pseudopods. Collagen fibers and calcified substances were observed in the matrix of the HOS cells by TEM on the zirconium as well as on the titanium. The calcium of the HOS cell layer was stained well by Dahl's method. Analysis of the HOS cell layer by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy indicated that the HOS cells formed the same matrices including the apatite on the zirconium as on the titanium. Measurements of the zirconium and titanium elution into the human saliva indicated that the elution of zirconium was less than that of titanium. These results suggest that zirconium possesses as excellent biocompatibility as titanium.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of biocompatibility and osseointegration of ceramic and titanium implants: an in vivo and in vitro study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;41(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Mar 8. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22406235
-
Differences in the calcification of preosteoblast cultured on sputter-deposited titanium, zirconium, and gold.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016 Mar;104(3):639-651. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35598. Epub 2015 Nov 14. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016. PMID: 26488234
-
Initial osteoblast-like cell response to pure titanium and zirconia/alumina ceramics.Dent Mater. 2007 Nov;23(11):1349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.023. Epub 2007 Jan 2. Dent Mater. 2007. PMID: 17197017
-
In vivo comparative biokinetics and biocompatibility of titanium and zirconium microparticles.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011 Sep 15;98(4):604-13. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33145. Epub 2011 Jun 30. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011. PMID: 21721117
-
In vitro differentiation of the human osteosarcoma cell lines, HOS and KHOS.Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1992;62(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/BF02899683. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1992. PMID: 1357821
Cited by
-
Binary titanium alloys as dental implant materials-a review.Regen Biomater. 2017 Oct;4(5):315-323. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbx027. Epub 2017 Sep 23. Regen Biomater. 2017. PMID: 29026646 Free PMC article. Review.