Objective: To describe the history and assessment strategies used to investigate and revise the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), a highly structured interview form used by lay interviewers to elicit diagnostic criteria for the common psychiatric disorders of childhood and adolescence.
Method: Revision was based on clinical and community data that identified unreliable and undiscriminating items in an earlier version of the instrument (DISC-1). A field study was carried out with 74 parent-child pairs. Interrater reliability and acceptability to patients was high. Accompanying papers describe the test-retest and construct validity of the instrument.
Conclusions: Taken together, the findings suggest that the DISC is an acceptable, brief, inexpensive, and convenient instrument for ascertaining a comprehensive range of child and adolescent diagnoses whose methodological properties are comparable with other child diagnostic instruments.