Subtle orthopedic fractures: teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation

Radiology. 1993 Jun;187(3):811-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497636.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether radiologists perform equally well with plain radiographs or digitized images displayed on a video monitor in interpretation of difficult orthopedic trauma cases. Interpretations with film and those made from a teleradiology system with spatial resolution of 2.35 line pairs per millimeter were compared in 120 difficult cases, 60 with the selected abnormality (ie, fracture or dislocation) and 60 that were control cases. Seven senior radiology residents and one radiology fellow each interpreted 60 randomly ordered cases with the teleradiology system (1,280 x 1,024-pixel monitors) and 60 cases with the original radiographs. The overall accuracy of the readers was 80.6% for film interpretations and 59.6% for teleradiology screen readings (P < .001). Sensitivity was 78.5% for film and 48.8% for on-screen images (P < .001), and specificity was 83.2% for film and 72.3% for on-screen images (P < .025). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed rejection of the null hypothesis in favor of film interpretation (P < .0049). It was concluded that the teleradiology system was not acceptable for primary diagnostic interpretation of difficult fracture cases.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Computer Terminals
  • Diagnostic Errors
  • Fractures, Bone / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • ROC Curve
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Telemedicine*
  • X-Ray Film*