Vowel prolongation is often used to evaluate disordered voice production. In light of previous findings showing that co-articulation has significant influence on laryngeal function measures, the practice of using prolonged vowels to represent a speech sample is questioned. To test whether disordered and normal voice during vowel production is generalizable to connected speech, three speaking tasks were investigated: sustained vowel prolongation, syllable repetition and reading. Statistical differences were found between these tasks for certain amplitude and time based laryngeal function measures for adult women with disordered and normal voice. However, for the specific measures which were statistically different, the actual numerical and perceptual differences may be quite small. From a clinical assessment standpoint, the choice of the speech task may not make an apparent difference in the objective evaluation of disordered voice.