Decline in the rate of hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction: impact of changing management strategies

Am Heart J. 1996 Feb;131(2):250-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90349-x.


This study examined the profile and management of acute myocardial infarction in patients hospitalized in the coronary care unit of Henry Ford Hospital to determine risk factors or treatments that best explained a decline in in-hospital mortality rates. During the 1980s and early 1990s, many therapeutic advances occurred in management of acute infarction. Overall and in-hospital mortality were observed also to decline, but little is known about the relation of newer treatments to clinical outcome. The study population consisted of 1798 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Of these, 982 consecutive patients were hospitalized in the coronary care unit of Henry Ford Hospital from January 1981 through December 1984 and compared with the 816 consecutive patients hospitalized from January 1990 through October 1992. Data on baseline demographics, initial clinical features, in-hospital management, and in-hospital outcome were compared for the two groups. Logistic regression was used to define independent predictors of the improved outcome of the two groups. Demographic features of the earlier group were similar to those of the later cohort, with the exception of a greater incidence of diabetes and hypertension and a lesser incidence of angina and prior heart failure. The occurrence of non-Q wave infarction increased from 27% in the earlier to 39% in the later group, whereas the magnitude of peak creatine kinase elevation in serum was higher in the later group. Medical management differed significantly, with increased use of aspirin, thrombolytics, heparin, warfarin, nitrates, and beta-blockers and decreased use of antiarrhythmic agents, digoxin, and vasopressors in the later group. Coronary revascularization was performed during hospitalization in 6.4% of the earlier group of patients and 31.6% of the later group. In-hospital mortality was 14.7% in the earlier group and 7.4% in the later group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the difference in mortality between the two groups was best accounted for by increased use of beta-blockers, angioplasty, and thrombolytics, decreased incidence of cardiogenic shock and asystole, and decreased use of lidocaine. In conclusion, the presentation and in-hospital management of patients with acute myocardial infarction has changed from the early 1980s to the early 1990s. The improved hospital mortality rate may be associated with both the expanded use of effective therapies and a more favorable in-hospital course, although these are not mutually exclusive.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Cardiovascular Agents / therapeutic use
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Coronary Care Units / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over
  • Hospital Mortality / trends*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Michigan
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Myocardial Infarction / mortality*
  • Myocardial Infarction / therapy
  • Myocardial Revascularization / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome


  • Cardiovascular Agents