Euclidean distance matrix analysis: confidence intervals for form and growth differences
- PMID: 8579192
- DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330980107
Euclidean distance matrix analysis: confidence intervals for form and growth differences
Abstract
Analysis of biological forms using landmark data has received substantial attention recently. Much of the statistical work in this area has concentrated on the estimation of average form, average form difference, and average growth difference. From the statistical, as well as the scientific point of view, it is important that any estimate of a scientifically relevant quantity be accompanied by a statement regarding its accuracy. Such a statement is contained in a confidence interval. The purpose of this paper is to provide a method to obtain confidence intervals for form difference and growth difference estimators. The estimators are based on Euclidean distance matrix analysis. The confidence intervals are calculated using the model independent bootstrap method. We illustrate the method by using three examples: morphological differences between samples of craniofacial patients and normal controls using two dimensional data from head X-rays, sexual dimorphism of craniofacial morphology in Cebus apella, and sexual dimorphism of facial growth in Cebus apella using three-dimensional data.
Similar articles
-
Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data.Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991 Nov;86(3):415-27. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330860307. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991. PMID: 1746646
-
Morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth in Cebus apella.Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991 Mar;84(3):323-42. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330840308. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1991. PMID: 2024716
-
Ontogeny and diachronic changes in sexual dimorphism in the craniofacial skeleton of rhesus macaques from Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico.J Hum Evol. 2007 Oct;53(4):350-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jul 23. J Hum Evol. 2007. PMID: 17645909
-
A simple method for visualization of influential landmarks when using euclidean distance matrix analysis.Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998 Nov;107(3):273-83. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199811)107:3<273::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-1. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998. PMID: 9821492 Review.
-
A coordinate-free approach to the analysis of growth patterns: models and theoretical considerations.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1993 Aug;68(3):381-411. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1993.tb00737.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1993. PMID: 8347767 Review.
Cited by
-
From shape to cells: mouse models reveal mechanisms altering palate development in Apert syndrome.Dis Model Mech. 2013 May;6(3):768-79. doi: 10.1242/dmm.010397. Epub 2013 Mar 8. Dis Model Mech. 2013. PMID: 23519026 Free PMC article.
-
A dysmorphic mouse model reveals developmental interactions of chondrocranium and dermatocranium.Elife. 2022 Jun 15;11:e76653. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76653. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35704354 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional shape differences in the bony pelvis of women with pelvic floor disorders.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):431-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1876-y. Epub 2012 Jul 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22806486
-
Mouse models of 17q21.31 microdeletion and microduplication syndromes highlight the importance of Kansl1 for cognition.PLoS Genet. 2017 Jul 13;13(7):e1006886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006886. eCollection 2017 Jul. PLoS Genet. 2017. PMID: 28704368 Free PMC article.
-
Mandibular dysmorphology due to abnormal embryonic osteogenesis in FGFR2-related craniosynostosis mice.Dis Model Mech. 2019 May 30;12(5):dmm038513. doi: 10.1242/dmm.038513. Dis Model Mech. 2019. PMID: 31064775 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
