Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response
- PMID: 8624390
- DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85758-9
Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response
Abstract
Tissue engineering in vitro and in vivo involves the interaction of cells with a material surface. The nature of the surface can directly influence cellular response, ultimately affecting the rate and quality of new tissue formation. Initial events at the surface include the orientated adsorption of molecules from the surrounding fluid, creating a conditioned interface to which the cell responds. The gross morphology, as well as the microtopography and chemistry of the surface, determine which molecules can adsorb and how cells will attach and align themselves. The focal attachments made by the cells with their substrate determine cell shape which, when transduced via the cytoskeleton to the nucleus, result in expression of specific phenotypes. Osteoblasts and chondrocytes are sensitive to subtle differences in surface roughness and surface chemistry. Studies comparing chondrocyte response to TiO2 of differing crystallinities show that cells can discriminate between surfaces at this level as well. Cellular response also depends on the local environmental and state of maturation of the responding cells. Optimizing surface structure for site-specific tissue engineering is one option; modifying surfaces with biologicals is another.
Similar articles
-
In vitro effects on MG63 osteoblast-like cells following contact with two roughness-differing fluorohydroxyapatite-coated titanium alloys.Biomaterials. 2002 Sep;23(17):3651-9. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00098-4. Biomaterials. 2002. PMID: 12109691
-
The enhanced characteristics of osteoblast adhesion to photofunctionalized nanoscale TiO2 layers on biomaterials surfaces.Biomaterials. 2010 May;31(14):3827-39. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.133. Epub 2010 Feb 13. Biomaterials. 2010. PMID: 20153521
-
Early osteoblast responses to orthopedic implants: Synergy of surface roughness and chemistry of bioactive ceramic coating.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Jun;103(6):1961-73. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35326. Epub 2014 Sep 24. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015. PMID: 25255702
-
Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review.Tissue Eng. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1-2):1-18. doi: 10.1089/ten.2005.11.1. Tissue Eng. 2005. PMID: 15738657 Review.
-
Balancing osteoblast functions and bacterial adhesion on functionalized titanium surfaces.Biomaterials. 2012 Apr;33(10):2813-22. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Jan 16. Biomaterials. 2012. PMID: 22257725 Review.
Cited by
-
In Vitro Enhanced Osteogenic Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded in a Poly (Lactic-co-Glycolic) Acid Scaffold: A Systematic Review.Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024 Mar;17(1):61-73. doi: 10.1177/19433875231157454. Epub 2023 Feb 13. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024. PMID: 38371215 Review.
-
Efficacy of bone defect therapy involving various surface treatments of titanium alloy implants: an in vivo and in vitro study.Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 17;13(1):20116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47495-w. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37978333 Free PMC article.
-
Extrusion 3D-printing and characterization of poly(caprolactone fumarate) for bone regeneration applications.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024 May;112(5):672-684. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37646. Epub 2023 Nov 16. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024. PMID: 37971074
-
Synergistic Enhancement of Protein Recruitment and Retention via Implant Surface Microtopography and Superhydrophilicity in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Oct 26;24(21):15618. doi: 10.3390/ijms242115618. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37958605 Free PMC article.
-
Biomimetic Scaffolds for Tendon Tissue Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;8(2):246. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8020246. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37366841 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
