Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables

J Urol. 1996 May;155(5):1621-3.

Abstract

Purpose: We compared our experience with self-contained inflatable and multicomponent prostheses during similar intervals.

Materials and methods: We followed 295 patients with self-contained prostheses and 1,026 with multicomponent inflatable devices for up to 8 years. Revision rates for mechanical failure, infection or patient dissatisfaction were statistically analyzed.

Results: Multicomponent inflatable prostheses were superior with regard to mechanical reliability and patient satisfaction, with no differences in rate of infection. Self-contained prostheses were best replaced with the AMS 700CX device, thus avoiding aneurysm.

Conclusions: Self-contained inflatable prostheses may be of limited value for the treatment of impotence. The AMS 700CX is the device of choice for replacement of explanted self-contained prostheses.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Penile Prosthesis*
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors