Short latency facilitation between pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex
- PMID: 8761035
- DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95664-7
Short latency facilitation between pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex
Abstract
Pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli were applied over the motor cortex at interstimulus intervals of 1-6 ms, and EMG responses recorded from the relaxed or active first dorsal interosseous muscle of 7 normal subjects. In relaxed subjects, when the interval between the stimuli was around 1.0-1.5 ms, 2.5-3.0 ms or 4.5 ms or later, the size of the response to the pair of stimuli was much greater than the algebraic sum of the response to each stimulus alone. During contraction, fewer peaks of facilitation were observed. Facilitation was evident if the stimuli were 0.9-1.1 times threshold in the relaxed state, and 1.0-1.1 times threshold during voluntary contraction. Experiments using either magnetic followed by anodal electric stimulation, or pairs of anodal electric stimuli, suggested that the facilitation most likely occurred within the cerebral motor cortex. Given the timings at which facilitation is prominent, it seems likely that it reflects interactions between circuits normally responsible for production of I-waves.
Similar articles
-
Intracortical origin of the short latency facilitation produced by pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex.Exp Brain Res. 1999 Dec;129(4):494-9. doi: 10.1007/s002210050919. Exp Brain Res. 1999. PMID: 10638423
-
Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912. J Physiol. 1993. PMID: 8120818 Free PMC article.
-
The excitability of human cortical inhibitory circuits responsible for the muscle silent period after transcranial brain stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2000 Jun;132(3):384-9. doi: 10.1007/s002210000352. Exp Brain Res. 2000. PMID: 10883387
-
Paired-pulse magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: differences among I waves.J Physiol. 1998 Jun 1;509 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):607-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.607bn.x. J Physiol. 1998. PMID: 9575308 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of digital nerve stimuli on responses to electrical or magnetic stimulation of the human brain.J Physiol. 1992 Feb;447:535-48. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019016. J Physiol. 1992. PMID: 1593458 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Inflammation and Corticospinal Functioning in Multiple Sclerosis: A TMS Perspective.Front Neurol. 2020 Jul 7;11:566. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00566. eCollection 2020. Front Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32733354 Free PMC article.
-
Cortico-cortical and motor evoked potentials to single and paired-pulse stimuli: An exploratory transcranial magnetic and intracranial electric brain stimulation study.Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):3767-3778. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23274. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016. PMID: 27312488 Free PMC article.
-
Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition.Exp Brain Res. 2003 Aug;151(3):330-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1502-9. Epub 2003 Jun 12. Exp Brain Res. 2003. PMID: 12802553
-
Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2009 Jan;2(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Oct 7. Brain Stimul. 2009. PMID: 20633398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individualized brain inhibition and excitation profile in response to paired-pulse TMS.J Mot Behav. 2014;46(1):39-48. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2013.850401. Epub 2013 Nov 18. J Mot Behav. 2014. PMID: 24246068 Free PMC article.