Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 8855459
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199608010-00007
Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Study design: Cervical spine manipulation and mobilization were reviewed in an analysis of the literature from 1966 to the present.
Objectives: To assess the evidence for the efficacy and complications of cervical spine manipulation and mobilization for the treatment of neck pain and headache.
Summary of background data: Although recent research has demonstrated the efficacy of spinal manipulation for some patients with low back pain, little is known about its efficacy for neck pain and headache.
Methods: A structured search of four computerized bibliographic data bases was performed to identify articles on the efficacy and complications of cervical spine manual therapy. Data were summarized, and randomized controlled trials were critically appraised for study quality. The confidence profile method of meta-analysis was used to estimate the effect of spinal manipulation on patients' pain status.
Results: Two of three randomized controlled trials showed a short-term benefit for cervical mobilization for acute neck pain. The combination of three of the randomized controlled trials comparing spinal manipulation with other therapies for patients with subacute or chronic neck pain showed an improvement on a 100-mm visual analogue scale of pain at 3 weeks of 12.6 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.15, 25.5) for manipulation compared with muscle relaxants or usual medical care. The highest quality randomized controlled trial demonstrated that spinal manipulation provided short-term relief for patients with tension-type headache. The complication rate for cervical spine manipulation is estimated to be between 5 and 10 per 10 million manipulations.
Conclusions: Cervical spine manipulation and mobilization probably provide at least short-term benefits for some patients with neck pain and headaches. Although the complication rate of manipulation is small, the potential for adverse outcomes must be considered because of the possibility of permanent impairment or death.
Comment in
-
Risk of manipulative cervical treatment.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jul 15;22(14):1676-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00032. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997. PMID: 9253107 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration.Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1051-1070. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1374. Epub 2019 Feb 28. Eur J Pain. 2019. PMID: 30707486 Review.
-
Use of thoracic spine thrust manipulation for neck pain and headache in a patient following multiple-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a case report.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;44(6):440-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5026. Epub 2014 May 10. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014. PMID: 24816502
-
Effect of cervical vs. thoracic spinal manipulation on peripheral neural features and grip strength in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;53(3):333-341. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04431-8. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017. PMID: 28215058 Clinical Trial.
-
Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD004249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 23;(9):CD004249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004249.pub4 PMID: 20091561 Updated. Review.
-
Upper cervical and upper thoracic thrust manipulation versus nonthrust mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jan;42(1):5-18. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3894. Epub 2011 Sep 30. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012. PMID: 21979312 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Characterization of side effects sustained by chiropractic students during their undergraduate training in technique class at a chiropractic college: a preliminary retrospective study.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Mar;49(1):46-55. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005. PMID: 17549151 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based protocol for structural rehabilitation of the spine and posture: review of clinical biomechanics of posture (CBP) publications.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Dec;49(4):270-96. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005. PMID: 17549209 Free PMC article.
-
Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and postural balance in patients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain--a pilot study.Chiropr Osteopat. 2009 Jun 30;17:6. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-17-6. Chiropr Osteopat. 2009. PMID: 19566929 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized controlled trials of a single session.J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):E42-52. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.2.42E. J Man Manip Ther. 2008. PMID: 19119388 Free PMC article.
-
Chiropractic care for children: Controversies and issues.Paediatr Child Health. 2002 Feb;7(2):85-104. doi: 10.1093/pch/7.2.85. Paediatr Child Health. 2002. PMID: 20046278 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
