Canine tooth guidance and temporomandibular joint sounds in non-patients and patients

J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Dec;23(12):799-804. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1996.00422.x.

Abstract

In 46 non-patients and 46 patients, the authors examined the presence (+) and absence (-) of canine tooth guidance (CG), i.e. dynamic dental articulation events in contrast to static dental occlusion events. During a right and a left laterotrusion of the mandible, the number of simple, mutually exclusive and exhaustive tooth guidance events (possibilities) was four. In addition, the authors examined the associations between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds and canine guidance events. In non-patients, CG+ was relatively infrequent (30%), and CG- was relatively frequent (70%). In patients, CG+ was relatively infrequent (22%), and CG- was relatively frequent (78%). In both non-patients and patients, bilateral CG+ was rather infrequent (15%). In both non-patients and patients with the presence of TMJ sounds, CG+ was relatively infrequent (38%) while CG- was relatively frequent (61%). In non-patients as well as patients, no evidence was found that distal CG+ (putative lateral retrusive guidance) was associated with ipsilateral TMJ sounds (relative risk = 0%), nor that the association between mesial CG+ (putative lateral protrusive guidance) and ipsilateral TMJ sounds was beyond that of mere chance (relative risk = 50%).

MeSH terms

  • Cuspid / physiology*
  • Dental Articulators
  • Dental Occlusion*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Jaw Relation Record / instrumentation
  • Male
  • Mandible / physiology
  • Prevalence
  • Probability
  • Risk Factors
  • Sound
  • Temporomandibular Joint / physiology*
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / physiopathology*
  • Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome / physiopathology