Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease
- PMID: 9100714
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05170.x
Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the agreement of physician judgments of capacity to consent to treatment for normal and demented older adults.
Design: Subjects were individually administered a standardized consent capacity interview. Physicians viewed videotapes of these interviews and made judgments of capacity to consent to treatment.
Setting: University medical center.
Participants: Subjects assessed for competency (N = 45) were 16 normal older controls and 29 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). Five medical center physicians with experience assessing the competency of dementia patients were recruited from the specialties of geriatric psychiatry, geriatric medicine, and neurology.
Measurements: Subjects were videotaped responding to a standardized consent capacity interview (SCCI) designed to evaluate capacity to consent to treatment. Study physicians blinded to subject diagnosis individually viewed each SCCI videotape and made a judgment of competent or incompetent to consent. Agreement of physician judgments was evaluated using percentage agreement, kappa, and logistic regression.
Results: Competency judgements of physicians showed high agreement for controls but low agreement for AD patients. Physicians as a group achieved 98% judgment agreement for the controls but only 56% judgment agreement for the mild AD patients. The physician group kappa for controls was 1.00 (P < .0001) and differed significantly (P < .0001) from the physician group kappa of .14 (P = .44) for AD patients, indicative of a real difference in the ability of the study physicians to judge consistently competency across the two groups. Similarly, logistic regression analysis showed significant variability in physician judgements for the AD group (chi 2 = 63.8, P < .0001) but not for the control group (chi 2 = 4.1, P = 1.00). Within the Ad group, pairwise analyses revealed significant judgment disagreement (P < .01) for seven of the 10 physician pairs.
Comment in
-
Physician judgment.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Feb;46(2):250-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02551.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998. PMID: 9475461 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Consistency of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Aug;48(8):911-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06887.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000. PMID: 10968294
-
Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05171.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997. PMID: 9100715
-
Cognitive models of physicians' legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer's disease.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Aug;48(8):919-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06888.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000. PMID: 10968295
-
Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research.Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8 Suppl 4:5-18. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994. PMID: 7695856 Review.
-
Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Sep;40(9):950-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01995.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992. PMID: 1512393 Review.
Cited by
-
Cognitive Correlates of Impaired Testamentary Capacity in Alzheimer's Dementia.Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Aug 23;37(6):1148-1157. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac034. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022. PMID: 35731016
-
The Testamentary Capacity Assessment Tool (TCAT): validation and normative data.Neurol Sci. 2022 Apr;43(4):2831-2838. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05736-8. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Neurol Sci. 2022. PMID: 34787752
-
Broad concepts and messy realities: optimising the application of mental capacity criteria.J Med Ethics. 2022 Nov;48(11):838-844. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107571. Epub 2021 Aug 2. J Med Ethics. 2022. PMID: 34341150 Free PMC article.
-
Applying decision-making capacity criteria in practice: A content analysis of court judgments.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246521. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33544766 Free PMC article.
-
Dementia, Treatment Decisions, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. A New Framework for Old Problems.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 9;11:571722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.571722. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 33240127 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
