Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection
- PMID: 9179173
- DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<183::aid-nur2>3.0.co;2-e
Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection
Abstract
The health promotion model (HPM) was tested as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection (N = 359). Theoretical and exploratory models fit well, with the theoretical model accounting for 36.3% of variance and the exploratory model accounting for 50.6% of variance in hearing protection use. Value of use (benefits of using hearing protection), barriers to use, and self-efficacy were significant predictors in both the theoretical and exploratory models, but perceived health status was a predictor only in the theoretical model. In the exploratory model, where modifying factors were allowed direct relationships with use of hearing protection, two modifying factors--noise exposure and interpersonal influences-modeling--were significant predictors. Results of this test of the HPM are consistent with the revised HPM (Pender, 1996). There were significant direct paths from modifying factors to behaviour. Use of hearing protection was best predicted by behavior-specific predictors, such as perceived barriers to use of hearing protection. Results support the use of the HPM to predict use of hearing protection.
Similar articles
-
Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection.Nurs Res. 1994 May-Jun;43(3):151-7. Nurs Res. 1994. PMID: 8183656
-
Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.Nurs Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;51(2):100-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200203000-00006. Nurs Res. 2002. PMID: 11984380
-
Comparison of the original and revised structures of the Health Promotion Model in predicting construction workers' use of hearing protection.Res Nurs Health. 2006 Feb;29(1):3-17. doi: 10.1002/nur.20111. Res Nurs Health. 2006. PMID: 16404731
-
Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.AAOHN J. 1997 Aug;45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. AAOHN J. 1997. PMID: 9341314 Review.
-
Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD005234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005234.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16625628 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Development and initial validation of questionnaire on predictors for the use of hearing protection devices among noise exposed manufacturing workers in Tanzania: A methodological study.Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;11:1102343. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102343. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36844814 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Literature Review of the Factors Influencing Hearing Protection Device Usage among Industrial Workers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;20(4):2934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042934. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36833630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence of physical activity levels and perceived benefits of and barriers to physical activity among Jordanian patients with coronary heart disease: A cross-sectional study.Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:1041428. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1041428. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36684963 Free PMC article.
-
Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 4;19(9):5578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095578. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35564973 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of Hazardous Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing Loss, and Hearing Protection Usage Among a Representative Sample of Working Canadians.J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jan;59(1):92-113. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000920. J Occup Environ Med. 2017. PMID: 28045804 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
