A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for caesarean section

Anaesthesia. 1997 Oct;52(10):1005-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.191-az0324.x.

Abstract

We studied 681 patients in a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, parallel group trial designed to assess the incidence of headache following spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section using four different pencil point spinal needles. The needles used were: Whitacre 25G (n = 170), Polymedic 25G (n = 170), Sprotte 24G (n = 173) and Polymedic 24G (n = 168). The incidence of all headaches prior to discharge was 11.1%. Only five headaches (0.75%) were severe with features of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and required an epidural blood patch: Whitacre 25G = 0, Polymedic 25G = 1 (0.6%), Sprotte 24G = 2 (1.2%), Polymedic 24G = 2 (1.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups for PDPH. We conclude that all four needles studied performed satisfactorily and comparably.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anesthesia, Obstetrical / adverse effects
  • Anesthesia, Obstetrical / instrumentation*
  • Anesthesia, Spinal / adverse effects
  • Anesthesia, Spinal / instrumentation*
  • Cesarean Section*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Dura Mater / injuries
  • Female
  • Headache / etiology*
  • Humans
  • Needles*
  • Pregnancy