Blocks of the foramen rotundum and the oval foramen: a reappraisal of extraoral maxillary and mandibular nerve injections

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Oct;35(5):328-33. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(97)90405-8.

Abstract

Objective: To present our experience of regional anaesthesia with blocks of the foramen rotundum and the oval foramen.

Design: Open study.

Setting: University Hospital, Beograd, Yugoslavia.

Subjects: 107 patients who underwent 58 maxillary and 49 mandibular nerve blocks.

Interventions: Injection of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline 1/80,000 with an 18 G venflon or 20 G spinal needle.

Main outcome measures: Quality of anaesthesia and morbidity.

Results: 49 of the 58 maxillary (84%) and 45 of the 49 mandibular (92%) nerve blocks were successful (no sensitivity to pinprick in the distribution of the injected nerve and a painless operation). There were 17 complications (26%), 8 in the maxillary and 9 in the mandibular group. All complications were minor and transient, and 6 could be attributed to anhydrous glycerol rather than the injection technique itself.

Conclusion: Blocks of the foramen rotundum and the oval foramen achieve good regional anaesthesia in the maxillofacial region.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage
  • Epinephrine / administration & dosage
  • Glycerol / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Injections / instrumentation
  • Lidocaine / administration & dosage
  • Mandible / surgery
  • Mandibular Nerve*
  • Maxilla / surgery
  • Maxillary Nerve*
  • Needles
  • Nerve Block / adverse effects
  • Nerve Block / methods*
  • Pharmaceutical Vehicles / adverse effects
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Sensation / drug effects
  • Sphenoid Bone*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Trigeminal Neuralgia / surgery
  • Vasoconstrictor Agents / administration & dosage

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Pharmaceutical Vehicles
  • Vasoconstrictor Agents
  • Lidocaine
  • Glycerol
  • Epinephrine