A comparison between a direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and the shell-vial culture (SVC) was conducted to evaluate their efficacies according to the quality and origin of the sample and the type of herpes simplex (HSV) responsible for the infection. The SVC detected all 58 HSV-infected samples, while the DFA detected only 49 (84.5%) positive samples. The DFA detected HSV type 1 in 22 of 89 samples (24.7%) and HSV type 2 in 27 of 96 samples (28.1%). Compared with the SVC, the DFA had a sensitivity of 75.8% for HSV type 1 and 93.1% for HSV type 2. The sensitivity of the DFA depends on the quality of the sample. Thus, while DFA is recommendable as a screening method, the SVC remains the method of choice for obtaining the maximum diagnostic yield from the sample.