Hangman's fracture: arguments in favor of surgical therapy for type II and III according to Edwards and Levine

Surg Neurol. 1998 Mar;49(3):253-61; discussion 261-2. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00300-5.

Abstract

Background: The optimal therapy for traumatic fractures of the neural arch of the axis, the so-called hangman's fractures, is still controversial. Indications for surgery depend on the type of hangman's fracture and/or additional injuries of the intervertebral disc or ligaments.

Methods: Sixteen patients sustaining fractures of the neural arch of the axis were treated by the screw fixation technique evolved by Judet. The passive mobility of the cervical spine was analyzed postoperatively by the radiographic evaluation method of Dvorak and coworkers and Penning. The angulation and anterior translation of C2 on C3 was measured before and after surgery.

Results: Follow-up investigations 3, 12, and in some cases 45 months later confirmed sufficient functional results especially regarding the mobility of the upper cervical spine. Comparison of pre- and postoperative angulation and anterior translation of C2 on C3 revealed a significant improvement especially in cases with type IIa fractures.

Conclusion: The stabilization technique of Judet facilitates an exact reconstruction of anatomical conditions thereby preserving the atlantoaxial rotational mobility. A negligible hypomobility of the C2-C3 segment was observed on average 18 months after surgery.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging
  • Cervical Vertebrae / injuries*
  • Cervical Vertebrae / pathology
  • Cervical Vertebrae / physiopathology
  • Cervical Vertebrae / surgery*
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Spinal Fractures / classification*
  • Spinal Fractures / diagnostic imaging
  • Spinal Fractures / pathology
  • Spinal Fractures / physiopathology
  • Spinal Fractures / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome