Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
- PMID: 9529492
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: The most important surgical complication following rectal resection with anastomosis is symptomatic anastomotic leakage, which is associated with a 6-22 per cent mortality rate. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum.
Methods: From 1980 to 1995, 272 consecutive anterior resections for rectal cancer were performed by the same surgical team; 131 anastomoses were situated 5 cm or less from the anal verge. The associations between clinical anastomotic leakage and 19 patient-, tumour-, surgical-, and treatment-related variables were studied by univariate and multivariate analysis.
Results: The rate of clinical anastomotic leakage was 12 per cent (32 of 272). Multivariate analysis of the overall population showed that only male sex and level of anastomosis were independent factors for development of anastomotic leakage. The risk of leakage was 6.5 times higher for anastomoses situated less than 5 cm from the anal verge than for those situated above 5 cm; it was 2.7 times higher for men than for women. In a second analysis of low anastomoses (5 cm or less from the anal verge; n = 131), obesity was statistically associated with leakage.
Conclusion: A protective stoma is suitable after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer for anastomoses situated at or less than 5 cm from the anal verge, particularly for men and obese patients.
Comment in
-
Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (Br J Surg 2001; 88: 400-4).Br J Surg. 2001 Sep;88(9):1266-7. Br J Surg. 2001. PMID: 11531884 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk.ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jul;76(7):579-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03780.x. ANZ J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16813622
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum.Colorectal Dis. 2004 Nov;6(6):462-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00657.x. Colorectal Dis. 2004. PMID: 15521937
-
[Anastomotic dehiscence in colorectal surgery. Analysis of 1290 patients].Chir Ital. 2007 Sep-Oct;59(5):599-609. Chir Ital. 2007. PMID: 18019632 Italian.
-
[The dehiscence of colorectal anastomoses: the risk factors].Ann Ital Chir. 2000 Jul-Aug;71(4):433-40. Ann Ital Chir. 2000. PMID: 11109667 Review. Italian.
-
[Anastomotic leakage after traditional surgery of the colon and rectum].Minerva Chir. 2003 Apr;58(2):167-74. Minerva Chir. 2003. PMID: 12738926 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Elderly Rectal Cancer: An Updated Review.Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Feb;26(2):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01495-9. Epub 2024 Jan 25. Curr Oncol Rep. 2024. PMID: 38270849 Review.
-
Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2023 Nov 21;21(3):e14493. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14493. Online ahead of print. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 37989718 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery in a Moroccan center: A case series and literature review.SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023 Nov 9;11:2050313X231205716. doi: 10.1177/2050313X231205716. eCollection 2023. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37954544 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of transverse colostomy versus ileostomy in colorectal anastomosis on post-operative wound complications: A meta-analysis.Int Wound J. 2023 Nov 8;21(3):e14428. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14428. Online ahead of print. Int Wound J. 2023. PMID: 37938886 Free PMC article.
-
Cyanoacrylate in Colorectal Surgery: Is It Safe?J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5152. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155152. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37568554 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
