The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities
- PMID: 9719655
- DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2785
The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities
Abstract
The research literature in organizational justice has examined in some detail the dynamics and consequences of justice judgments based on direct experiences with fair and unfair authorities, but little is known about how people form justice judgments on the basis of reports of injustice by others or how group discussion changes justice judgments. The present study examined the consequences of distributed injustice, in which all members of a group experience some denial of voice, and concentrated injustice, in which one member experiences repeated denial of voice and others do not. It was predicted and found that mild personal experiences of injustice are a more potent source of group impressions of injustice than are reports of more severe injustice experienced by others. In both conditions, group ratings of unfairness were more extreme than were the mean of individual ratings either before or after discussion. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
Similar articles
-
Justice within social dilemmas.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):375-87. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_09. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003. PMID: 14633473
-
Neural mechanisms of the mood effects on third-party responses to injustice after unfair experiences.Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Aug 15;43(12):3646-3661. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25874. Epub 2022 Apr 15. Hum Brain Mapp. 2022. PMID: 35426965 Free PMC article.
-
It's not fair: an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of discourses of justice and fairness in chronic pain.Health (London). 2011 Sep;15(5):459-74. doi: 10.1177/1363459310383593. Epub 2010 Dec 15. Health (London). 2011. PMID: 21169206
-
Individualistic and social motives for justice judgments.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Sep;1299:60-7. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12143. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013. PMID: 25708080 Review.
-
The Emerging Social Neuroscience of Justice Motivation.Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;21(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 16. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017. PMID: 27865787 Review.
Cited by
-
Personal relevance affects the perceived immorality of politically-charged threats.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 29;18(12):e0296177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296177. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38157337 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived overall injustice and organizational deviance-Mediating effect of anger and moderating effect of moral disengagement.Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 5;13:1023724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023724. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36544441 Free PMC article.
-
Does Internet Connect to Social Justice Perception in China?Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 10;13:917039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917039. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35756292 Free PMC article.
-
How LMX Differentiation Attenuates the Influence of Ethical Leadership on Workplace Deviance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment.Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:693557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693557. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34777088 Free PMC article.
-
Leadership Ostracism Behaviors From the Target's Perspective: A Content and Behavioral Typology Model Derived From Interviews With Chinese Employees.Front Psychol. 2019 May 24;10:1197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01197. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31178804 Free PMC article.