Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
, 88 (9), 1303-7

White, European, Western, Caucasian, or What? Inappropriate Labeling in Research on Race, Ethnicity, and Health

Affiliations
Review

White, European, Western, Caucasian, or What? Inappropriate Labeling in Research on Race, Ethnicity, and Health

R Bhopal et al. Am J Public Health.

Abstract

The request for scientifically appropriate terminology in research on race, ethnicity, and health has largely bypassed the term White. This and other words, such as Caucasian, are embedded in clinical and epidemiological discourse, yet they are rarely defined. This commentary analyzes the issue from the perspective of the epidemiology of the health of minority ethnic and racial groups in Europe and the United States. Minority groups are usually compared with populations described as White, Caucasian, European, Europid, Western, Occidental, indigenous, native, and majority. Such populations are heterogeneous, the labels nonspecific, and the comparisons misleading. Terminology that reflects the research purpose-for examples, reference, control, or comparison--is better (unlike White, these terms imply no norm, allowing neither writers nor readers to make stereotyped assumptions about the comparison populations. This paper widens the debate on nomenclature for racial and ethnic groups. Many issues need exploration, including whether there is a shared understanding among the international research community of the terms discussed.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 54 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. BMJ. 1996 Apr 27;312(7038):1054 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Apr 15;122(8):614-7 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1997 Mar 8;314(7082):705-10 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1997 Jun 14;314(7096):1751-6 - PubMed
    1. Ethn Health. 1996 Mar;1(1):95-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback