Transposed basilic vein versus polytetrafluorethylene for brachial-axillary arteriovenous fistulas

Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2):219-21. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00122-6.

Abstract

Background: Both transposed basilic vein (BV) and polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) upper arm arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are common angioaccess operations. To evaluate the patency and complication rates after AVF, a concurrent series of patients was reviewed.

Methods: Ninety-eight patients underwent brachial artery to axillary vein AVF: 30 BV and 68 PTFE. The PTFE grafts were performed in the standard fashion, whereas the basilic veins were translocated subcutaneously to the brachial artery.

Results: Risk factors were similar between the two groups. Basilic vein AVF had better patency at 24 months (70% BV versus 46% PTFE, P = 0.023). The dialysis access complications were higher in the BV group (20%) versus PTFE (5%), but the PTFE group had a higher infection rate (10%) than BV (0%).

Conclusions: The primary and secondary patency rates were superior in the BV AVFs. The BV AVF preserves the venous outflow tract after AVF thrombosis for a future PTFE AVF operation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / adverse effects
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / methods*
  • Axillary Vein
  • Brachial Artery
  • Female
  • Forearm / blood supply
  • Hand / blood supply
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Vascular Patency
  • Veins / surgery

Substances

  • Polytetrafluoroethylene