A randomized controlled trial of two methods for collection of sterile urine in neonates

J Paediatr Child Health. 1998 Oct;34(5):460-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1998.00272.x.

Abstract

Objective: To test whether urethral catheterization (UC) is better than suprapubic bladder aspiration (SPA) as a method for collection of sterile urine in neonates.

Methods: Thirty-three babies, requiring sterile collection of urine, were randomly assigned to either urethral catheterization (n=16), median gestation 28+/-3.9 weeks, median birth weight 968 g (range 650-4100) or SPA (n=17), median gestation 26+/-5.6 weeks, median birth weight 926 g (range 771-4070). The primary outcome was success in obtaining urine. Secondary outcomes were complications and urine culture results.

Results: Some urine was obtained in 11 (64.7%) babies in the SPA group and in 13 (81.2%) babies in the catheter group. Sufficient urine for analysis (>0.5 ml) was obtained in 10 (58.8%) in the SPA group versus 5 (31.2%) babies in the catheter group. There were more contaminated specimens in the catheter group but this was not significant in this small study.

Conclusions: In this small randomized controlled trial urethral catheterization offered no significant advantage over SPA.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Cystostomy / adverse effects
  • Cystostomy / methods*
  • Equipment Contamination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Specimen Handling / methods*
  • Suction / adverse effects
  • Suction / methods*
  • Urinalysis*
  • Urinary Catheterization / methods*