Confidentiality in crisis: Part I--The duty to inform

Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;43(10):1001-5. doi: 10.1177/070674379804301004.

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the ethical and legal imperatives to protect third parties from harm in circumstances often believed to be protected by doctor-patient confidentiality.

Method: A review of recent legislative changes and legal decisions pertaining to a psychiatrist's duty to warn.

Conclusion: The current legislative and legal climate presents many risks to the concept of doctor-patient confidentiality. Psychiatrists must carefully consider any guarantees of confidentiality made to patients and must discuss the limits of confidentiality when obtaining consent for treatment.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Confidentiality / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Crisis Intervention*
  • Duty to Warn / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Humans