Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 1999 Jan;9(1):17-26.

Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 9950122
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Appendectomy

J M Garbutt et al. Surg Laparosc Endosc. .

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether laparoscopic or open appendectomy gives better outcomes for patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Studies were selected from the MEDLINE database, personal files, and meeting abstracts. Eleven of 21 randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled effect size estimates were calculated using a random effects model. Laparoscopic appendectomy reduced time to full functioning by 5.48 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.70 to 7.26; p < 0.001), improved postoperative pain at 24 hours measured by a visual analog scale from 0 to 10 by 1.19 points (95% CI -2.14 to -0.24 points; p=0.014), and decreased the absolute risk for wound infection by 3.2% (95% CI -5.6% to -0. 8%; p=0.009). Operating time was increased by 17.12 min (95% CI 14.19 to 20.03; p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the two surgeries for length of hospital stay, readmission rate, and intra-abdominal abscess formation. Laparoscopic appendectomy improves patient outcomes.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 51 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Feedback