Similar articles for PMID: 23886407

Year	Number of Results
1946	1
1948	1
1949	1
1950	1
1961	1
1982	1
1991	1
1996	1
1997	1
2000	6
2001	1
2002	1
2003	2
2004	5
2005	13
2006	5
2007	9
2008	7
2009	3
2010	8
2011	9
2012	10
2013	7
2014	4
2015	8
2016	7
2017	3
2018	3
2019	4
2020	7
2021	5
2022	2

1

Range of motion in a modular femoral stem system with a variety of neck options.

Hariri S, Chun S, Cowan JB, Bragdon C, Malchau H, Rubash HE. Hariri S, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1625-33. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.011. Epub 2013 Jul 23. J Arthroplasty. 2013. PMID: 23886407

2

Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.

Hisatome T, Doi H. Hisatome T, et al. J Orthop Sci. 2011 Mar;16(2):229-37. doi: 10.1007/s00776-011-0039-1. Epub 2011 Feb 26. J Orthop Sci. 2011. PMID: 21359509

3

Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y. Matsushita A, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):646-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Mar 18. J Arthroplasty. 2009. PMID: 18534445

4

Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.

Miki H, Sugano N. Miki H, et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011 Nov;26(9):944-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 15. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011. PMID: 21680069

5

Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.

Girard J, Krantz N, Bocquet D, Wavreille G, Migaud H. Girard J, et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012 Feb;27(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Sep 16. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012. PMID: 21925779

6

Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.

Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Kluess D, et al. Med Eng Phys. 2007 May;29(4):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Aug 9. Med Eng Phys. 2007. PMID: 16901743

7

Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion.

Gondi G, Roberson JR, Ganey TM, Shahriari A, Hutton WC. Gondi G, et al. J South Orthop Assoc. 1997 Winter;6(4):266-72. J South Orthop Assoc. 1997. PMID: 9434247

8

Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Debbi EM, Quevedo González FJ, Jerabek SA, Wright TM, Vigdorchik JM. Debbi EM, et al. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S678-S684. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.112. Epub 2022 Mar 8. J Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35271980

9

The incidence of femoral component version change in primary THA using the S-ROM femoral component.

Kindsfater KA, Politi JR, Dennis DA, Sychterz Terefenko CJ. Kindsfater KA, et al. Orthopedics. 2011 Apr 11;34(4). doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110228-06. Orthopedics. 2011. PMID: 21469634

10

Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter.

Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Kluess D, et al. Acta Orthop. 2008 Dec;79(6):748-54. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016803. Acta Orthop. 2008. PMID: 19085490 Free article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed