Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position

Angle Orthod. 2014 Mar;84(2):246-53. doi: 10.2319/031213-212.1. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the esthetic preference of White and Chinese judges with regard to Chinese lip position.

Materials and methods: The profile images of a dental and skeletal Class I Chinese adult male and female were digitally adjusted to Chinese mean values. The lip profile was adjusted with the upper and lower lip at the mean distance from the Ricketts' E-line. These images were used as baseline images and were further digitally manipulated to generate six additional images with the upper and lower lip such that they lay 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 standard deviations (SDs) in front of or behind the E-line. An additional image was modified based on a White mean value. The images were viewed and ranked by 251 White and Chinese judges (dentists and laypersons) in Australia and China.

Results: Significantly more Chinese judges ranked the retrusive profiles higher than the White judges. The White judges also ranked the profile image adjusted to -0.5 SD as the most esthetic for both the female and male, while the Chinese judges ranked the -1.0 SD profile as the most esthetic.

Conclusions: The ethnicity of the judges is a significant factor influencing the perception of esthetic lip position. The Chinese judges prefer a more retrusive profile and are more likely to rate a protrusive profile as unacceptable, compared with the White judges.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Asian People*
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Attitude to Health* / ethnology
  • Australia / ethnology
  • Cephalometry / methods
  • Esthetics*
  • Female
  • General Practice, Dental
  • Hong Kong / ethnology
  • Humans
  • Lip / anatomy & histology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Orthodontics
  • Photography / methods
  • Specialties, Dental
  • Visual Analog Scale
  • White People*
  • Young Adult